Universities are important public institutions. The education of students and the research undertaken on campuses have a broad impact throughout our economy and society. In Canada, a significant portion of university budgets also comes from government.
In smaller cities and towns, universities are often among the largest employers in addition to serving as important community hubs. Perhaps nowhere has this impact become more apparent than Sudbury, Ont., where — as the province of Ontario’s auditor-general reported — mismanagement at Laurentian University led to significant job losses and disruption to the local economy.
Given the public significance of the university sector, the increasing labour unrest that we are seeing there should be of concern to all citizens.
University labour strikes
In 2021-2022, a record six faculty associations were on strike in Canada, at Acadia University, Concordia University Edmonton, the University of Lethbridge, the University of Manitoba, the University of Ontario Institute of Technology and Université Sainte-Anne.
While faculty union contracts are typically negotiated for three or four years, the uncertainty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic led many universities to negotiate shorter “rollover” agreements that extended previous contracts, usually for a year or two, with their faculty unions.
Many of these are now coming up for negotiation, as are the normal-length contracts that were signed prior to the onset of the pandemic.
According to the Canadian Association of University Teachers, the result is that more than one-half of faculty unions in Canada are in collective bargaining this year.
Given the numbers, it would not be surprising if 2022-2023 sets a new record for the number of faculty strikes. There have already been two strikes in Canada: CUPE 3912, representing teaching assistants and part-time faculty at Dalhousie University, and CUPE 3906, representing similarly classed employees at McMaster University.
The 5-year agreement was ratified by 69.6% of members who voted. It includes wage increases of $6.32/hr, or 14.1%, over the agreement for graduate teaching and research assistants; and $5.66/hr, or 21.7%, for undergraduate teaching assistants.https://t.co/vYqpeHshRV pic.twitter.com/HatZR42WYn
— CUPE Local 3906 (@cupe_3906) December 13, 2022
How the public understands issues at stake
Contract negotiations can be difficult for many reasons and the public is often in the dark about the issues that ultimately lead to a strike.
While this may be true for any strike, it’s especially true in the academic sector. As faculty members who were involved in union communications during our strike at Acadia University in February 2022, we developed an appreciation of the challenges of getting information to the public.
Independently of our union work, we decided to explore more systematically how faculty unions get their message out when contract talks break down.
We have interviewed more than a dozen members of faculty union communications teams at five of the six universities that were on strike last year.
The government of Manitoba is appealing a court order to pay the University of Manitoba Faculty Association (UMFA) over $19.3 million in damages. Earlier this year, a Manitoba judge found that the province caused a strike by interfering in negotiations. https://t.co/Hajjw399J2
— The Manitoban (@themanitoban) January 18, 2023
The members we spoke to reported that, despite the significance of universities as public institutions, there was relatively little mainstream media coverage of their strike (and therefore little broad public attention).
We also compared coverage of strikes at Acadia University at the Halifax Chronicle Herald (the largest newspaper in Nova Scotia) in both 2022 and 2007.
We found that the paper ran only six stories about the recent strike during the four-week work disruption. By contrast, the Chronicle Herald ran 17 strike-related stories or columns during a three-week faculty strike at Acadia in 2007.
A recent analysis of media coverage of the strike at the University of California indicates that this is a broader problem within the academic sector as a whole. Specifically, three weeks into the largest academic strike in United States history, the mainstream media had provided scant coverage.
Little critical analysis
Much of it merely parroted news releases written by the two opposing sides (“the union says A; the administration says B”), with little critical analysis of either’s claims.
They also noted that the focus was often disproportionately on differences in salary proposals, even when salaries were not listed by striking union members as a particularly significant issue.
These limitations in media coverage likely stem from changes to the media landscape over the last couple of decades — in particular, the collapse of traditional revenue models for mainstream media outlets and the corporate consolidation and downsizing that has resulted from that.
The result is media outlets that assign reporters to produce content while investing minimal time and resources.
Turning to social media
To compensate for the lack of detailed coverage in the mainstream media, our research shows that faculty unions are increasingly turning to social media to try to get their message out about key bargaining issues.
These include issues like working conditions of part-time faculty, the need for improved diversity among tenure-track faculty, improved transparency in university governance and class sizes and other students’ learning conditions.
However, unions’ social media messages are primarily targeted at their members and students. They cannot replace the in-depth coverage of complex, enduring issues that is the purview of mainstream media.
Hi everyone! It’s been awhile since we posted about the long, challenging journey we’ve been on to get to our 16th Collective Agreement, but we have some news! First, “THANK YOU!” to the students, faculty unions, @CAUT_ACPPU & everyone who supported us along the way.
— AUFA (@AcadiaFaculty) August 5, 2022
Our ongoing research suggests that important reporting came from outlets that operated at a smaller scale, both geographic and financial.
For example, strike participants at Université Sainte-Anne, three hours from Halifax, commented on the important, if limited, coverage from the Tri-County Vanguard based in Yarmouth, N.S.
The Vanguard sent a reporter to cover the early days of the union’s seven-week strike, whereas the larger English-language media outlets mainly covered the strike when faculty travelled to Halifax or in its final weeks.
Even in those final weeks, CBC Nova Scotia — based in Halifax — relied on photographs submitted by striking faculty rather than sending journalists to the picket lines in Church Point, N.S.
Beat reporters a rarity
Coverage of the University of Manitoba Faculty Association strike was more in-depth in the independently owned Winnipeg Free Press, which, unlike many newspapers, still has an education beat reporter.
As university labour disputes continue, information about faculty associations’ positions and their analyses of why these issues matter can often be found on their social media platforms
In the longer term, however, effective coverage will require policy support for local, independent media outlets, as well as effective professional support for people reporting on labour and education beats that are critical to the public interest.
Author Bios: Andrew Biro is a Professor, Politics, Joseph Hayes is Associate Professor, Psychology and Rachel K. Brickner is Professor of Politics all at Acadia University